Posted By Blake Hounshell Share

Many commentators have made the point over the last week, as James Ledbetter does here, that the supposedly laissez-faire Bush administration has now embarked on a socialist program that rivals anything Franklin Delano Roosevelt ever dreamed up during the New Deal era.

But it's not just the U.S. federal government that is moving to control the commanding heights of the American economy. Foreign firms, too, are going to be taking their pound of flesh.

The Financial Times adds some context to a move by the Federal Reserve that could make yesterday's partial sale of Morgan Stanley to Mitsubishi a lot more common in the coming days:

[T]he Federal Reserve threw open the doors to investment in the US banking industry by private equity firms, sovereign wealth funds and corporate investors – in the hope that this would direct much-needed capital to US banks.

The US central bank said it would raise the maximum stake a minority investor could take in a bank holding company from 25 per cent to 33 per cent in some instances and lift the ban on board representation for minority investors.

In other words, the Fed is making it easier for a wide array of entities -- including foreign governments -- to purchase large chunks of U.S. banks.

Can you imagine how it's going to play once Abu Dhabi Investment Council and the China Investment Corp., two of the world's largest sovereign wealth funds, start to buy up the pillars of American capitalism at fire-sale prices? Some of that has already happened, but we ain't seen nothin' yet, I'd wager.

EXPLORE:FINANCE
 

JGARZIK

11:11 AM ET

September 23, 2008

Homes: to own, or not to own

The Bush administration certainly is a study in media contradictions.

Though painted as a free-market, de-regulating neo-conservative by the media, Bush has presided over increases in government size and scope, increases in government spending, increases in entitlement obligations, and now massive market inventions.

It will be interesting to see which political party will wind up with the most "war guilt" from this market meltdown, in terms of media portrayal. Both the Democrats and Republicans can take a healthy dose of blame, though Democrats Dodd and Frank are looking particularly bad for repeatedly shunting aside Fannie and Freddie reform attempts.

A key aspect of this debate is an open question: was it wrong to make home ownership more affordable, by relaxing the standard "20% cash downpayment" rule bankers normally apply? This is really a political question with no easy answers.

If you support increased home ownership, as Dodd and Frank did for decades, you pushed for Fannie and Freddie (and by extension, other banks, because Fan & Fred set the standards) to accept mortgage packages which would finance the downpayment, such as an "80-15-5": 80% first mortgage, 15% second mortgage, 5% cash downpayment. You pushed for Fannie and Freddie to accept borrowers with less than stellar credit.

Proponents would argue that home ownership brings society many benefits, such as stability and investment in the country's future.

But policies that encourage home ownership have flaws that are obvious to us today: Lending standards decline. Increased foreclosures. Owners have far smaller stakes in their property, which means little or no cushion if asset prices decrease. Increased numbers of mortgage-related businesses to sell to, and take advantage of, marginal (read: poor or less-educated) peoples.

Not to mention the obvious environmental cost of increased home ownership, and suburban sprawl.

One of the reasons why the Hong Kong property market is attractive is the tradition "20% cash" downpayment is enforced by banks far more strictly than in the United States. Hong Kong is certainly not immune to asset price bubbles, and property is insanely expensive a la Manhattan, but one can argue that it is a bit more sane in the mortgage loan department than the United States.

Jeff @ Armchair FP

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More