Posted By Blake Hounshell Share

Kevin Drum does yeoman's work here in batting down the argument, frequently offered in recent days, that the Bush administration somehow encouraged Mikheil Saakashvili's reckless attack on South Ossetia:

Look: Saakashvili came to power on a Georgian nationalist platform of recovering Abkhazia and South Ossetia. He's been jonesing for an excuse to send troops in for years, regardless of anything the U.S. did or didn't do. Likewise, Putin has been eagerly waiting for an excuse to pound the crap out of him in return — again, regardless of anything the U.S. did or didn't do.

Kevin correctly lists Kosovo and NATO enlargement among several "general" drivers of the conflict, but I would be more specific. Let's roll the tape.

When Western countries recognized Kosovo in February, then-President Vladimir Putin immediately threatened to do the same regarding South Ossetia and Abkhazia and promised to deploy more "peacekeeping" troops there. And he made good on his warning in April, granting the two breakaway regions a status just short of official recognition.

The Georgians were duly provoked, and they got busy mobilizing troops and preparing fuel supplies. In May, Russia deployed troops to Abkhazia; Georgia's state minister warned that the two countries were "very close" to war. By August, volunteers were pouring into South Ossetia from southern Russia, and the two sides were trading fire. All the while, as Kevin points out, State Department officials were trying to convince Saakashvili to "stay cool."

Foolishly, he didn't, and here we are. But if anyone encouraged this conflict, it was Moscow, not Washington. If Saakashvili thought the U.S. military would come to his aid, then he's simply delusional -- there was no way it was going to happen.

On a broader level, the Bush administration made two key mistakes. The first was setting an awkward precedent in Kosovo. It would have been smarter to leave the situation ambiguous, like Taiwan. The second was in trying to bring Georgia into NATO prematurely. When in April, Germany and France delayed Georgia's membership action plan (MAP) until it had settled its internal conflicts, that was basically an invitation to Putin to destabilize the country. It would have been better not to push for a MAP at all.

In short, a naive and overconfident West has badly misjudged how Putin would respond to its diplomatic moves. That's the real problem here -- not some imagined whispering in Saakashvili's ear.

EXPLORE:CAUCASUS, GEORGIA, RUSSIA
 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

PAPICEK

9:12 PM ET

August 16, 2008

It works for Putin in so many ways...

that you almost have to admire how finely this Georgian invasion was calculated.
  1. It's payback for humiliating Russia's ally, Serbia.
  2. It's a unilateral action that mirrors the last eight years of US foreign policy.
  3. And last but not least: there's only one way to announce your great power status. You need to humiliate another great power, and Putin's managed that here as well.
There are several sour notes for Putin, though. Recent events have hardened anti-Moscow sentiment, as we've seen in Poland. And elsewhere. According to CNBC's Business Russia, Moscow will be looking for more western investment in the coming year and Western investors, already alarmed over the Russian's government interference in the "shareholder's dispute" with TNK-BP's CEO Robert Dudley are even more jittery.

How Russia proceeds from here will tell us just how far Moscow is willing to snub the international system—even after winning her point in Georgia—for the undoubted domestic political gains United Russia stands to make. Watching the reaction in the rest of South Asia and Eastern Europe will tell us how much work lies ahead for the US.

 

EUGENESUCKS

4:50 AM ET

August 17, 2008

In an article about 'who

In an article about 'who encouraged who' shouldn't there be some mention of the military aid given to Georgia by the United States for the last several years? http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/08/did-us-military.html
 

BLAKE HOUNSHELL

7:53 AM ET

August 17, 2008

Yes, but

That was all counterinsurgency training and equipment. As we saw, it didn't do much for them against the Russian tanks and airpower. To the extent that U.S. military aid encouraged the Georgians, I think the onus here is on the Georgians.
 

MOMO

8:14 AM ET

August 17, 2008

Brave Georrgia troops in war

Brave Georrgia troops in war against childrens and women Whach this: http://www.youtube.com//watch?v=koWWyrDXQVs
 

ANTALDANIEL

4:03 PM ET

August 17, 2008

And there were the thousands

And there were the thousands and thousands in South Ossetia and Abkhazia who had received Russian passport recently. Daniel Antal
 

JGARZIK

4:07 PM ET

August 17, 2008

Germany on NATO

Does anybody have a transcript, or additional info?

AP story: German Chancellor Angela Merkel is offering strong support for Georgia, saying the country is on track to become a member of NATO. [...] Merkel also suggested that NATO could help rebuild the tattered Georgian military.

The AP headline says "Germany offers support for Georgia's NATO bid" but that is quite ambiguous. We still don't know what concrete steps will be taken, or if Germany is now happy with a MAP for Georgia.

Jeff @ Armchair FP

 

PAPICEK

8:54 PM ET

August 17, 2008

the video of Saakashvili and Merkel's

press conference should be available at CNN. I watched what I think was the whole thing this morning. Good luck.
 

PAPICEK

9:42 PM ET

August 17, 2008

I found the video...

here. It appears to be in three parts.
 

TORTMASTER

1:22 PM ET

August 18, 2008

Soviet Trolls!

I see a few of the paid Soviet trolls have been posting here...remarkable the extent to which you guys have been visiting and pasting comments into the blogosphere.
 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More