Posted By Blake Hounshell Share

Good stuff today from Clive Crook:

The US does not know whether to tax energy or subsidise it, promote domestic oil production or forbid it, treat ExxonMobil and Chevron as champions or pariahs. So it does all of the above.

I should note that both Barack Obama and John McCain are incoherent on this point. As the New York Times dryly observes, Obama favors ethanol subsidies, "some of which end up in the hands of the same oil companies he says should be subjected to a windfall profits tax." As for John McCain, he seems not to understand what cap and trade means.

 

NQUIXOTE

10:16 AM ET

June 23, 2008

Subsidizing ethanol and then

Subsidizing ethanol and then taxing a company's overall profits will give the company an incentive to shift from oil production to ethanol production. You may not like corporate taxes or ethanol in general, but economically Obama's is not an incoherent policy.

This blog post is trying to draw a false parity between Obama and McCain. McCain really is trying to have it both ways on energy policy; Obama is not.

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More