Global News : Passport : Ricks : Drezner : Walt : Rothkopf : Lynch
The Cable : The AfPak Blog : Net Effect : Shadow Govt. : Madam Secretary : The Call
What's in a name? A lot, if you're Macedonia.
Greek prime minister Costas Karamanlis said today that his country will block
So what’s wrong with “
Speaking between rounds of negotiations between Skopje and
I want to be very clear on this. The intransigence of our neighbor is dashing its ambitions to join NATO and the European Union. If there is no settlement, the neighboring country cannot aspire to join NATO. Our position 'no solution-no invite' is clear."
On Tuesday, U.N. envoy Matthew Nimetz proposed five name alternatives: Constitutional Republic of Macedonia, Democratic Republic of Macedonia, Independent Republic of Macedonia, New Republic of Macedonia and
Clearly, these choices were not satisfactory to Macedonians because riots broke out on Wednesday over the prospect of tampering with the country’s constitutional name. With Greece still hung up on a name from the third century B.C., Serbia's 1389 claim to Kosovo suddenly seems more reasonable.













It's ironic that the best
It's ironic that the best predictor of whether a country is run by crazed despots is whether the name of the country is preceded by "Democratic Republic of". So perhaps it's not the ideal choice for Macedonia.
Karamanlis
Karamanlis and his no invite talk, could really backfire on him and the nation as a whole, sometime I think he is being a big baby and somewhat of a whinny man !
Another day, another utterly ridiculous dispute in the Balkans
Oh.for.the.love.of.sanity.
Added to that...
...is the fact that many Bulgarians refuse to recognize Macedonian as a distinct ethnic or linguistic group, but rather claim that their Bulgarian. You've got to feel for this little country.
And added to that...
...is the fact that the Macedonian Orthodox Church hasn't been recognized either. No name of their own. No language of their own. No church of their own. They're not working with much here.
But do they have a beer?
...
Oh, they have beer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heRcmWaB0rk
Re:
sexy prom dresses 2009 | prom hairstyles 2009
Dig deeper
When I say Balkans, you say...? The force of the knee-jerk responses are enough to cause injury to some noses on here. The Balkanians like to squabble, don't they? Well, they do. But are they so unlike other civilized tribes? Unlike Americans who never start wars? Or W. Europeans? The French and Germans would never get involved in wars, eh?
Please. Stop with the generalizations.
As to the specifics, if this were only about a name, it would indeed be a ridiculous argument. But it's not. Dig a little deeper. This dispute blew up years ago when the Macedonians adopted Greek symbols such as the White Castle of Salonika as their own, on their money, on their flag. Granted, they changed those symbols, but does the irredentist longing for Salonika as a capital remain? That's the question that needs to be answered. Even their former President (who applied for and received Bulgarian citizenship and then moved to Bulgaria) has criticized the Macedonian leadership for pushing their irredentist demands.
Have a look at this essay on what the real stakes are. You be the judge:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0802/S00363.htm
Dan Asta is a Greek
The idea that Macedonia has 'irredentist demands' on Greece is absurd. The Macedonians are far more preoccupied by the existence of a newly liberated Kosovo than they are by anything their grumpy neighbors to the south might be doing. What does Greece mean for Macedonians? A nice place to go the beach and a source of economic investment as much of the retail reality of Skopje originates in Greece.
This is an absurd situation that originates in the well of hurt Greek pride.....a well that seems to be bottomless.
Macedonia is a multi-ethnic,multi-religious and generally peaceful little republic that wants everyone to like it so that it can get into the EU as fast as possible. The only thing it longs for is for people to come and visit. People should not believe everything they read on the internet.
Does it really matter what I am?
Regardless of the fact that you're incorrect on this score, I just linked to a page which is prototypical of the Macedonian arguments. I even agreed in my original post that the name issue on its face is ridiculous (which means, I agree that Macedonians should call themselves whatever they wish, if that's the entire context). I simply pointed out that whenever I've heard the counterclaims against the Greek position, they are always accompanied by peculiarities, the likes of which I linked to.
By the way, is this place always so leaden with knee-jerk responses? If someone comes here and disagrees with you, then the response is: eek, he's Greek (or Iraqi, or Serb, I suppose).
Greek special vocabular used for Macedonians
It is interesting how you only notice the counterclaims against the Greek position accompanied by peculiarities and you do not notice how the Greeks address to us the Macedonians.I will give you few examples:
**i'm your nightmare..fyromonkeys
**You are nothing but American donkeys. Now kiss your supporter's ass because without US...heheheh....buy buy dream
And the military bases they're gonna install in your fake state are gonna be real beauties.
**Caution don't say anything they don't like because then boom boom boom. Buy buy Macedonian dream
**Everyone in this forum with a basic school education laughs at you reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
You are zontovola reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
Ou sto diaolo koloaderfes tou kerata.
Scopjians say "Oh Alexandar (...andar???? hehehehe) was not Greek but only Macedonian, oh oh oh, please Greeks let us have our name."
Audience: heheheheheheheheheheh
**Do you know why the FYROMIAN TURKOSLAVOMONGOLS call the city not with its Greek name Thessalonike but with the TurkoSlavoMongolic "Solun"????
Answer: Their TurkoSlavoMongol forefathers wanted to remember their ANCESTRAL places in MONGOLIA!!!
**How Slavoskopjans tsobans pass their time
**Propaganda for Village Idiots
**slav(e)s you listen goooood
**fyromian lies
**titozombies
Everywhere where are open discussion forums the Greeks are abusing them.How come on one website for the position Macedonia on the website you will get above 100000 discussions, while at the same time for the position of the website on Greece you will get only 6000? I will have to check for other locations this interesting phenomenon.
Huh?
I cited a Council of Foreign Relations writing in the press, not the racist idiocies of bloggers.
The reasonableness of the Greek position
The issue of the ethnicity of the ancient Macedonians is peripheral to the diplomatic discussion.
The geographical region of Macedonia is split between Greece, fYROM, Bulgaria, and a small part of Albania. Thus, it is inaccurate to call fYROM Republic of Macedonia, since it does not encompass the entire region of Macedonia (not even most of it).
The geographical region of Macedonia, and fYROM itself are also not inhabited uniquely by Slav Macedonians. Indeed, the single biggest ethnic group in the geographical region of Macedonia is Greek, followed by self-defined "Macedonians" (Slav Macedonians); there are also Bulgarians, Albanians, Aromuns (Vlachs), and Roma (Gypsies) in the geographical region of Macedonia.
The main problem is that the dominant ethnic group of fYROM (Slav Macedonians) claims for themselves the name "Macedonian" without qualification, as well as the territorial name "Macedonia", again without qualification, even though both as an ethnic group and as territory they are only a part of Macedonia, and indeed not even the greater part.
Greece has taken the completely reasonable position that fYROM should be called by a name that disambiguates "Macedonia", in order to make clear that Macedonia is not limited to fYROM or the Slav Macedonian ethnic group. A name such as Republic of Upper Macedonia, or Republic of Slav Macedonia would be acceptable to the Greek government and to both major Greek political parties.
Have a complete picture
I think all of you need a visual in order to sense what we are REALLY taking about here.
Enjoy :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YevEHfkRO-o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09cRWUwPgco
Dig deeper in Macedonia
And you will find:
The situation in which Macedonia finds itself today can be traced back to the Balkan Wars of 1912-13. As a result of the Treaty of Bucharest, Macedonia was partitioned among Serbia, Greece, and Bulgaria. These regions are known as the Republic of Macedonia (independent since 1991), Aegean Macedonia (presently within the borders of Greece), and Pirin Macedonia (within the borders of Bulgaria). A small part of Macedonia was given to Albania in 1919 (known as Mala Prespa and Golo Brdo).
Upon annexation of Macedonia's territory, each country began terrorist campaigns aimed at expelling or forcibly assimilating the indigenous Macedonian population. Greece, in particular, began an intense campaign in order to eradicate the existence of Macedonia through a horrific policy of cultural genocide and ethnic cleansing. They outlawed the term Macedonia and proceeded to rename this region "Northern Greece". They changed the names of Macedonian people, villages, and landmarks from Macedonian to Greek. Bulgaria and Greece continue to deny the existence of their large Macedonian minorities to this day and refuse to grant them human rights. The human rights violations have been well-documented. Albania offers its Macedonian minority limited human rights but the situation does not compare to the human rights and freedoms enjoyed by the Albanian minority in the Republic of Macedonia
Interested to know the problems of the unrecognized Macedonian minority in Greece: www.florina.org
Macedonia is a small country only of 2 mil compared to today's Greece of about 10 mil and it is ridiculous to point at us that we have irridentist propaganda or territorial claims.
We would be happy if the refugees from the Civil war 1945-48 could return to their homes, they are still alive and are witnessing all their lives what Greece has done to the Macedonians.Basic human rights, the people there to be able learn and speak Macedonian language.
Right. That's exactly my point.
On the one hand, the claim is that there are no irredentist sentiments. And in the very next instant, the author provides a litany of irredentist complaints.
I thought that are Human
I thought that are Human Rights, it is something normal.Don't you think so?
Dig deeper in Macedonia
Krnja
Kalinka is 100% right. Makedonia was never Greek's, it was the other way arround, Makedonians conquered Greece, so territory which is at present Greece was occupied and ruled by Makedonians. Makedonians and Ilirians were allies and Greeks called Romans to liberate them from the Barbarian Makedonians and Ilirians.Of course Romans never left.Later on in the 6th century, what is now Greece was settled by Slavs, all the way to Peloponnese. Athens was a Slavic speaking city. Through church and Bisantic administration Slavs in southern part of Greece became Helenised.What is at present Makedonia, it was the Makedonian population that become Slavenized. The name Greece was adopted for the present territory in the 19th century, before that it was called Rumelia,and thanks for the 2nd Balkan war, Greece got ThessalonÃki and what they also cal Makedonia. Soon as they got this territory they ethnically cleansed it not only from Makedonians or by forcefully Helenized their names , they also cleansed of hundreds of thousands of Albanians, Turks and Jews.On their places they settled their refugees from Anatolia. This is the only a part of the story, I am sure there is more to it.
What is Greece doing now is the same cowardice as Italians by claiming parts of Slovenia and Croatia. When was Yugoslavia Greeks kept their mouth shut, now little Makedonia is easy target. The same was with the Turks.Greeks never in their history fought one single battle against Turks, but, after Turkey was finished by others, then they became heroes fighting few isolated Turkish garrisons stationed in what is the present Greece.
DAMN TURKS!!!!!!1!1!!!!!!
nt
The name of Macedonia is not the property of Macedonian Slavs
Greece has nothing to be afraid from fYROM. This, however, does not mean that it will surrender its rights to the Macedonian name. For example, there are many Greek businesses, schools, landmarks, etc. that use the Greek words "Macedonia", and "Macedonians"; moreover, millions of Greek citizens identify themselves as Greek Macedonians. Thus, we are not willing to let a foreign state usurp the name of Macedonia.
The Greek government is perfectly willing to reach a compromise with fYROM, with a name such as "Slav Macedonia" or "Upper Macedonia". Such a linguistic or geographical qualifier would disambiguate the name of fYROM, making it clear what it is. Just as there are Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots, two distinct groups inhabiting the geographical region of Cyprus, there are Greek Macedonians, and Slav Macedonians inhabiting the geographical region of Macedonia.
Jake Gittes in the Balkans
As T.E. Lawrence said to the Arabs "you were great once and could be great once again"... I think we should all say to the Greeks. But it will never happen until they decide that the way you lead is with ideas and not with recidivistic sabre-rattling over the heads of the defenseless...Greece seems to be stuck in some jingoistic generalissimo time warp....but at least their business people are far ahead of their loopy politicians....In the end though, as the "Macedonians" are really Bulgarians (which is why Bulgaria will give any Macedonia who asks for one, a passport) so the modern "Greeks" are really Albanians (check the DNA records if you don't believe me)....It's Chinatown, Jake....no, er, I mean the Balkans.
fade to black
Macedonia
In 1913 Greece and her allies Serbia and Bulgaria, with the help of more then 100,000 Macedonians who fought along these three armies, drove the Turks out of Macedonia, but Macedonia did not gain its freedom. Instead, the Balkan countries partitioned Macedonia among themselves and Greece occupied the largest part, 51% of the whole territory, called Aegean Macedonia
Even Greeks sources, including the king of Greece himself in 1912, confirm that when the Greek armies occupied Aegean Macedonia the overwhelming majority of the population were NOT Greeks, confirming the fact that the Greeks never lived in Macedonia since the most ancient times (Nikolaides, Spiros Melas Epopee).
But since 1913 Greece begun its assimilatory policies against the Macedonians, changing their family names to Greek names, renaming the cities, rivers, and mountains with Greek names, and forbidding the speaking of the Macedonian language.
In 1912 Ikaria gained it's
Greece Macedonia
USA Department of State recognize Macedonian ethnicity (different with Greece) before 1900 ,108 years ago.
But Greeks by own point of few and own history are in right.This is the time to ask Athens who managed and fixed Greek modern history .The Apian History of Rome is good lecture for modern Greeks ,but who can translate this to modern and manipulated Greek nation
Facts
The fact is that Skopje's airport carries the name of Alexander the Great, and that the official flag is the modified (only after Greek protests, before that it was just different in background colour) flag of the northern Greek region of Macedonia. Why falsify history? FYROM has nothing to do with Alexander the Great, and yet they keep insisting on it.
Macedonia
Difficult times for Greece.Thay had much more time to make historical falsificates.They are miserable xenofobes.If they think that they can burry the Macedonian history, language, tradition, people they are very wrong.Greece exists from 19 century.Macedonia has always been Macedonia.In the ancient times we were a kingdom, the today's Greeks lived in city states.
There is no such thing as FYROM.
Macedonia is Macedonia.It is a name of a republic.If the greeks have problem about their region called Macedonia, they can make something over there to change it to be different from the Republic of Macedonia.Here we are not planning to bother weather someone will use the name Macedonia or not.
another point of view
I am Greek and I believe that Greece has
right in this case but Greek politicians
have really screwed up.
My points of view:
1) the people that leave presently in FYROM
are mainly Slavs that historically came to the
region in the 6th century AD, much after the ancient
Macedonia. They do not speak the same language
as the ancient Macedonians. However, I recognize
that having lived so many years in this region,
it is natural to consider the ancient Macedonia
part of their culture/inheritance. You can easily
verify the above in wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Macedonia
2) The ancient Macedonia covered a much larger
geographical area the largest part of which
is presently within the geographic borders
of Greece.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonia_naming_dispute
3) To me calling FYROM Macedonia is kind of a
history hijacking of Greek culture. This is the
main reason Greeks are complaining about the
name. Alexander and Aristotle, for example, were
Greeks, spoke the Greek language, wrote in Greek,
and followed the Greek culture. Tomorrow, that
FYROM will probably stay in history as Macedonia,
the American or Australian child will never learn that the
ancient Macedonia had nothing to do with the modern
country Macedonia, but was mainly Greek. This
is the reason Greeks are not happy with the issue
and what I call history hijacking :).
4) Though, I second the arguments about the right
of self-determination and for picking your own
name, I dont see why FYROM does not accept a name
like North Macedonia, which 1) would respect their
linkage to the Macedonian region, name, history, and
culture, 2) would be geographically-wise historically accurate; and 3) would also leave Greece happy.
This is Great
This topic has crushed all the other's on yesterday's FP blog....we should all congratulate each other for our passion and insight! Sadly, given the state of the world little Macedonia is unlikely to get its day in (international) court. But let's be honest....the Macedonia of Alexander the Great has as much to do with modern Greece as the Aztecs have to do with modern Mexicans....which brings be to an interesting compromise from the Western Hemisphere....New Mexico.
New Macedonia? How about that? We have New Guinea and New South Wales....it's better than "North" or "Slav" because it suggests the real existential break that is desired yet retains some of the old flavor. Athens and Skopje are you listening? I am sure the Albanian minority in (New) Macedonia has their own ideas. South Kosovo, East Albania? But who will listen to them. The Band Plays On!
Macedonia
Just because Greece is insane and wants to change a name of a country it doesn't mean that this will happen.
Democracy
Lucy, beware that Greeks claim copyright on democracy and they are much hotter on it than Serbs on Kosovo.
Interesting blog and nice to see you commenting which you rarely did at B92.net
Best regards from Ljubljana
Marijan M. Miletic', MSc EE retired at 63
Yeah...
Yeah, different blog different approach. My B92 blog was sort of a test run. And to be honest, some of the comments there really weirded me out (re: an entire thread on the merits of women wearing makeup in the workforce, prompted my bio photo...). Glad you liked the Macedonia post.
Atlantic
Isolated Serbia developed a lot of weird trends! Please make reference to reading this comments at the bottom of your blog articles.
Still with Atlantic? No Kosova articles there from an experienced intern :-) I liked your ping-pong diplomacy blog remembering Chinese players coming to Tito's YU for the first time.
Greeks do not have right to the name of Makedonia
What percentage of today's Greek population are immigrants from Anatolia? They are closer to Turks and population of Asia Minor than to Europeans. Macedonians were not Greeks, how ever, being outnumbered by Greeks, they with the time and superior Greek culture became Helenized. The same thing was with the Slavs in the southern part of Greece. Northern part was dominated by Slav population and with the time Macedonians become Slavenized. Greeks have one leverage and at present it works. As a members of EU they have a veto power. Eventually EU is going to accept rightful name Republic of Macedonia.It is not the name which bothers them, it is the fact they do know that northern part of Greece is populated with people who has been forcefully Helenized, and they are afraid to sooner or later loose territory they never owed.
If this blog is any evidence
I would say that Lucy Moore's point about it being much ado about nothing is incorrect.
Clearly, the Macedonian bloggers here feel strongly about the Macedonia that abuts the Aegean Sea.
Do we all agree that this much is evident?
No
It doesn't sound that way to me. The concerns seem more about historic human rights violations that claims to Aegean territory.
And I stand by my point. Is a name really worth cheating 2 million people out of an EU future?
"cheating" is not imo the right way to put it
Eventually FYROM will make it to Europe. The
veto is just the only means left to Greece to
press on the name issue. According to Greek
politicians, Greece wants FYROM in Europe as
long as the name dispute is resolved. It's
not imo unreasonable to ask to resolve the
issue first.
Besides, since both countries have some right on
the Macedonian inheritance, I find a solution
along the lines of Slavo- or North Macedonia
fare. Could anyone argue on any *good* reasons
FYROM does not accept this? It gives me the
impression that FYROM wants to appear as the
only inheritor of the Macedonia history, which
I don't find right.
Note that the name choice is closely related to
economic issues too, as Greece and I believe FYROM
too get the majority of their income from tourism.
Slav Macedonians can enter the EU if they behave rationally
It is in the power of the 2 million people to have a EU future. It would only take acceptance of a compromise name such as "Republic of Upper Macedonia" or "Republic of Slav Macedonia" which accurately describes their state.
Macedonia is the name of my country
Who said so?The Greeks? You are creating monologue my friend.Moreover you are creating enemies, first of all you perceive us as your enemies.Why?Any reasonable answer?From what are you afraid of a country of 2 mil?
Then you apparently missed all the references
in the above blog posts to stolen territory.
Seriously, did you ignore this deliberately?
I linked to a Council on Foreign Relations report in which the person lists all the instances of the Greek gov't stealing territory from Macedonians.
I'm not sure why you claim these posts don't exist under your article when they obviously do. It's evident. Why deny it?
I apologize for missing one adjective in your
post. You wrote "historic human rights" violations.
I read over it and thought you wrote "human rights violations," as in current ones.
If you really believe these are historic rights violations rather than plaintive appeals for lost territory, you are indeed opening up a remarkable can of worms. This region has seen a lot of wars. The Greek settlers who came into Aegean Macedonia in the period of these "historic human rights violations" were themselves refugees from lost territories. Were there human rights violations in the Balkans (and Western Europe) during the 20th century? Of course. But what does it gain anyone to mention these? When Serbs mention the losses to the Croatian Ustashe 60 years ago, they are told, "Get over it."
By completely stripping the context out of the losses of territory, you're effectively giving support to irredentist claims, and this is clearly what the Greek gov't is objecting to.
Slavs, Bulgars, Albanians, Macedonians, Greeks, Gypsies, Vlachs, Turks, Jews, in the region all spilled blood. When you cast Greeks as the net victor, you also omit the fact that 2 million of them died in the period up until 1950 in such battles. Between the Macedonians, Albanians, Greeks and Bulgarians, you had alliances with Turkey, the Hapsburgs, the Nazis, the Soviets, the Allies, Tito's Partisans. With the ascendancy of each of these alliances, one ethnic group suffered. Sometimes the Bulgars, sometimes the Greeks, sometimes the Macedonians, sometimes the Albanians. In fact, in the Greek Civil War in which the Slav-speaking citizens were overwhelmingly aligned with a Communist cause receiving much of its logistical support from Tito, both sides suffered. Don't you think it's ironic that together with the expulsion of Slav speaking Macedonians from Greek territory a great many Greek-speaking Macedonians were also tossed out of the country? (I'm referring to ethnic Greeks from the region). This is because that war was an ideological battle.
If you really want to redress "Historical human rights violations," where do you start?
Every group in the Balkans is to blame for atrocities.
You really have to realize how all this rhetoric plays into the hands of irredentists. To ignore this is just naivete.
Cheating history for interests?
are you accusing Greece for human rights and not your country?
in Greece there are 25000 Slavophones and more than 3 million Macedonians=Greeks
Is cheating history approved by you?
just say a lot of things with a few of words...
Greek civilization has spread by Alexander(meaning in greek the one who protects men)...not seen a single proof that he was not Greek and ofcourse the slavs who came in balcan region after 1000 years have nothing to do with Macedonians
history?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBOQ8427FUk&feature=related
It is our obligation to defend the name Macedonia
Macedonia is a young state that became independent in 1991 and its roots run deep in the history. The name "Macedonia" is in fact the oldest surviving name of a country, in the continent of Europe. Archaeological evidence shows that old European civilization flourished in Macedonia, between 7000 and 3500 BC.
Macedonia is located in the centre of the Southern Balkans, north of ancient Greece, east of Illyria, and west of Thrace. The ancient Macedonians were a distinct nation, ethnically, linguistically, and culturally different from their neighbours. The origins of the Macedonians are in the ancient Brygian substratum (a language which influences another language), which occupied the whole of Macedonian territory, and in Indo-European super stratum, which settled here at the end of the second millennium.
History of the names Macedonia and Macedonians
The names "Macedonia" and "Macedonians" have been in existence, survived throughout the history, and at the same time negated. The struggle concerning the legitimacy over the territory of Macedonia is in close connection with these names.
The Macedonian people have been formed, within the frames of geographic and historical ground of Macedonia, in a continuity of developing process (tribe, people, nation). It has acquired the legitimacy over the territory of Macedonia and became the inheritor of all historical and cultural traditions and values. The region has carrying out the name of Macedonia through centuries, as its ethnic and historically legitimate name...
People are coming and going, sytems are changing, civilizations are changing,blogs are opened and closed but the name stays.
Is it a democratic vaue to impose on some nation how to be called?No, it is totaly absurd and could never make sense.Greece has to be preoccupied with their internal matters, how to make the life better there for their people.
In Romania also there is a region Moldova, same as the name of the country Moldova.Applying the logics of Greeks they should create a conflict where it doesn't exist.
FYROM vs. FTCOG
My FYROMian friends used to occasionally refer to their Southern neighbor as the FTCOG -- the Former Turkish Colony of Greece. 'Nuff said.
We are as former as the rest
We are as former as the rest of the ex-Yugoslav republics, as follows: former Yugoslav republic of Slovenia, former Yugoslav republic of Croatia, former Yugoslav republic of Serbia etc.And in the same time it rightfully applies to Greece that is a former Ottoman provence of (Greece) and their modern history begins 1832 with their first king the Bavarian Prince Otto.
Are you pleased FOPOGian friend?
regards from sunny Macedonia
Good idea
Doh!! What are you saying? As Ottoman subjects, Greeks were allowed to control all Christian subjects, Greek was the lingua franca for business and culture in the Empire (especially in the Balkans) and Greeks held the highest positions in many parts of the empire and in the Ottoman navy. Perhaps your 'FRYOmian' friends are yearning for those days...? Good idea.
What a "Witty' article
I think Serbia's claim to Kosovo is the fact that it has been apart of the country FOR THE LAST 80 YEARS and up until a few weeks ago and not because they lost a battle in 1389 there!!!
Greece's problem with FYROMacedonia is more than a "historic cultural claim" or territorial claims. The issue of Macedonia has been used by the Soviets and Yugoslavs and now the "Macedonian" Slavs as a way of blackmailing Greece, distorting history and laying claim to its territory since the 1940s. Not that this half-wit blogger would care to actually research the issue and isntead likes to make an article out of his own "witty" commentary.
And can someone tell this blogger, or his editor, that the word "historic" cannot be used in that sense. The word he's looking for is historical!!
yo dude. balkania
You ought to check out your own dreadful prose before you start tossing barbs at the FP writer....at least the original made grammatical sense. Nevertheless, everyone now knows that the whole of 'Yugoslavia' was a sham put forth by the Russians and Yugoslavian communists as a puppet buffer state. The Serbs apparently are the last ones left who believe otherwise but proved wholly incapable of keeping it all together except by wily attempts at genocide and ethnic cleansing. If Serbia hadn't been so brutally clumsy in dealing with the break-up they may have garnered some sympathy. Ironically, the Slav majority in Macedonia would probably wish that Kosovo would stay attached to Serbia in that Belgrade might be easier for them to deal with. 20% of Macedonia is Albanian and they not long ago were fighting it out with the Slavs on the streets of Tetovo. Undoubtedly the emergence of Kosovo is giving the Macedonian Albanians some new ideas. To call it Slav Macedonia is inaccurate because there are many non-Slavs living there and North Macedonia sounds like a bedroom community on Long Island.
I like New Macedonia....because that's what it is, in every sense of the word.
Greece says hands off fY/ROM - but Albanians rule 1/4 of it
Well, officially, 25% of the fY/ROM is Albanian, but higher if you count those without citizenship. Also, they form the majority in the west of the country - like Kosova did as part of Serbia. But apparently over 35% of the under-35 population is Albanian and the percentage increases dramatically as the age drops. Many ethnic Albanians consider themselves either as 'southern Kosovars' or future citizens of Dardania (Kosova, Montenegran border and western fY/ROM untied) - this dream already has a flag. The future is 'interesting' for fY/ROM and, it seems, only Athens is really interested that it remains single, united and prosperous.