McCain to go after Russia
Reading off McCain's teleprompter, Mark Halperin releases this tidbit from tonight's speech:
“We will make it clear to Russia’s rulers that acts of violence and intimidation come at a heavy cost.”
It will be interesting to hear how specific he gets in describing that cost.
In a related point, it was strange to hear Rudy Giuliani say last night that Barack Obama's "first instinct" when the war broke out was to "create a moral equivalency" between Georgia and Russia by calling for both sides to show restraint.
Obama's initial statement on Georgia was nearly identical to those from the State Department and White House. He also mentioned the need to "truly stand up for Georgia" during his convention speech and spoke with Mikheil Saakashvili on the phone yesterday. He certainly hasn't been as outspoken in support of Georgia as McCain, but Giuliani's statement was plain dishonest.












A New Call To Arms
Central foreign policy and national security issues, when contemplated long range, are tightly wound to our energy policy.
Newly-resurgent oil rich countries are testing our resolve as a geo-political power. We are tipping the balance by sending these unfriendly countries a whopping share of our national wealth to pay for oil.
A new national energy policy initiative is needed to make sure we end our reliance on oil, and to diminish the power and control the oil producing nations have over our economy, and our future.
Nothing less than a national energy project, reminiscent of the Manhattan Project that was implemented during the Second World War, is needed now!
Our standard of living and the future of our children depend on the energy choices we make today. We need to summon the national will to implement a do-or-die energy independence project before we become just another third world country.
The proposed Manhattan Energy Project will help create new industry while helping us keep more of our national wealth; furthermore, it will help weaken the new political power of some of our geopolitical enemies.
Our long term health and welfare, and our international prestige and status, depends on our leader's ability to view our present energy dependence as nothing less than a call to arms. Yes, we are not fighting this energy war with hand combat weapons; nevertheless, our failure to confront this threat will have greater consequences than if we had surrendered to the Axis Powers during the Second World War.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy conservation using radiant barrier paints that reduce thermal footprint.
--------------------------------------------------------------