U.S. sick-pet economy bigger than Botswana's GDP
Mon, 04/28/2008 - 11:42am
While reading an article yesterday in the Washington Post about the cost of caring for sick pets, I stumbled across this:
Americans spend an enormous sum on health care for their dogs, cats, birds, fish, ferrets, gerbils, lizards, potbelly pigs and other assorted pets: more than $24.5 billion in 2006 alone, according to the American Veterinary Medical Association. (If you're into comparing vast amounts of money, that's greater than the gross domestic product of more than half of the world's countries.)
Well, I am into comparing vast amounts of money, so chew on this: The U.S. pet healthcare economy is about the size of Bahrain or Botswana's GDP.
( filed under: )










In Defense of Animal Lovers
A snap reaction to this post might spark the feeling that Americans care more about animals then they do about poor humans. Is that what that figure 24.5 Billion suggests? I don't think so. It suggests, rather, that America is richer and larger than Bahrain and Botswana more than it reveals an American preference for animal sympathy over human sympathy. All forms of sympathy are good assuming that human life is still supremely valued. And judging by the size of the health care industry in the US, one can say we still care a lot more about Grandpa than we do about Spot.