In defense of biofuels

EU Energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs has a great new blog, and he's wasted no time in taking on a controversial issue. Biofuels have taken a lot of hits lately, but Piebalgs says the relationship between them and food prices is overblown:
Biofuels, have become a scapegoat for recent commodity price increases that have other causes – poor harvests worldwide and growing food demand generated by increased standards of living in China and India. In Europe, we use less than 2 percent of our cereals production for biofuels, so they do not contribute significantly to higher food prices in the European context. Even if we reach our 10% biofuels target by 2020, the price impact will be small. Our modeling suggests that it will cause a 8 to 10% increase in rape seed prices and 3 to 6% increase in cereal prices. Increase in the price of the latest has very small influence on the cost of bread. It makes up around 4 per cent of the consumer price of a loaf.
Even if price food price distortions are minor, I'm still not convinced the biofuels are worth the trouble given that it's not entirely clear whether they really do anything to reduce greenhouse emissions once land clearance is taken into account. Still, Piebalgs' blog should be great opportunity to hear from an informed voice in the debate.
- Energy | Environment | Europe










Biofuels
Any time you hear someone talk about "Biofuels" as one monolithic class of energy source, you should tune out immediately. Substances currently referred to by this overly broad moniker range from corn based ethanol (a massive scam) to biodiesel from waste oil (a great way to put nasty waste to good use) and everything in between.
Anyone who applies analysis on one fuel to all biofuels is either ignorant or they are attempting to mislead you.
A bigger consumer of grain
A bigger consumer of grain than biofuels is livestock. Less per capita meat consumption would lower food prices, help climate change, and save water.
The Nobel Peace Prize-winning head of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Rajendra Pachauri, listed reduced meat consumption as one of the three big things individuals could do that could help impact climate change. (Courtesy www.vegansocialclub.com)