It's about that time for McCain to pick a running mate

Tue, 03/04/2008 - 3:51pm

TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP/Getty Images

Beginning tomorrow morning, John McCain has to grab the bull by the horns and get serious about his vice presidential pick. I generally think too much hubbub surrounds the whole process. Historically, VP running mates have had little impact on a candidate's performance in November. But given McCain's age and intraparty troubles, the decision could be disproportionately important for him.

It was more or less a foregone conclusion back in 2000 that, had he won the nomination, McCain would have asked Sen. Chuck Hagel to join the ticket. But Barack Obama's staff is now openly floating Hagel, the Republican Party's most prominent Iraq war critic, as a possible running mate for the Illinois senator. So, this time around, Hagel seems an unlikely choice for McCain. Early last month, I argued that the Arizona senator ought to take a long hard look at Newt Gingrich. Other names floating around at the time included Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, former Ohio Rep. Rob Portman, and Sens. Tom Coburn, Sam Brownback, and Richard Burr, as well as Florida Gov. Charlie Crist. They all remain contenders.

In recent days, Condoleezza Rice's name has been appearing with increasing frequency. But, as Condi herself is prone to reminding people, she's never run for anything and has no desire to do so. Not to mention the fact that she carries with her all of the baggage of the Bush administration and has yet to stake out positions on the economy and the social issues about which conservatives care most.

In a conversation with Reuters, Douglas Brinkley puts Colin Powell's name on the table. Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman is reported to be on the shortlist by his home state newspaper. Meanwhile, Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who certainly would have been on McCain's shortlist and is campaigning hard for him, now says she won't accept an invitation to run with McCain and, instead, is considering her own bid for the nomination in 2010.

One person who's getting only a little attention, but perhaps should get more, is Chris Cox. The former California congressman and China hawk is a poster boy for conservatives and currently heads the Securities and Exchange Commission. He would both bring California into play and bring some much needed economic acumen to McCain's camp. That could make things interesting.



Advertisement

 

Shadow government

Once a nomination has been secured, each candidate should do more than just select a running mate. They should form a shadow government (of the non-conspiracy sort), so that the vetting process of key cabinet members and appointments may begin long before the general election.

Putting CALIFORNIA into play?

That's about as likely as John Edwards--a statewide officeholder, unlike Cox, who was never elected to a wider office than U.S. Representative from Orange County--putting North Carolina into play for Kerry in 2004. Which, of course, didn't happen.

Hmmmm

Well... Hagel is fiercely anti-Iraq War and Crist is gay, so cross them off your list. Gingrich would certainly help fire up the base, but I don't think he would take the offer. All in all, I think Pawlenty is the best pick: executive experience, younger, will likely help carry a crucial swing state, and will make Coleman's Senate reelection more likely than it currently is. Can't really ask for more than that from a VP!

why not rudy?

why not rudy?

Definitely not Powell.

I forget where I read it, but there was an interview with him recently where he praised Obama very highly and said he was considering voting for him. If he's going to get involved in this election at all, I think it will be to endorse Obama -- not to run with McCain.

Altogether Elsewhere

Apparently Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison is no economist either

I almost spit out my Cheerios yesterday morning while watching an interview with Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison on CNN. She was running through the list of problems the U.S. needed to address and said, "we need to strengthen the dollar because it is killing our trade deficit" [this may not be an exact quote - I'm still in a bit of shock]. I'd like to give her the benefit of the doubt that she misspoke and meant to say "adding to our inflation problems" or something else but for a senator and potential VP candidate to have such a fundamental lack of understanding of the impact of a weak dollar on international trade is scary.